Digite uma palavra ou frase em qualquer idioma 👆
Idioma:
Tradução e análise de palavras por inteligência artificial ChatGPT
Nesta página você pode obter uma análise detalhada de uma palavra ou frase, produzida usando a melhor tecnologia de inteligência artificial até o momento:
- como a palavra é usada
- frequência de uso
- é usado com mais frequência na fala oral ou escrita
- opções de tradução de palavras
- exemplos de uso (várias frases com tradução)
- etimologia
O que (quem) é prosecutor$64657$ - definição
UK LEGAL CASE
Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor
Crown prosecutor (Australia)
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN AUSTRALIA
Crown Prosecutor, Australia; Crown Prosecutor (Australia)
Crown prosecutors are the public prosecutors in the legal system of Australia. In Western Australia, they are referred to as State prosecutors.
Prosecuting
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
Prosecution; Prosecute; Prosecution's; Prosecutors; Prosecuted; Public prosecutor; Public Prosecutor; Prosecuting attorney; Public prosecutors; Prosecuting; Prosecuting Attorney; Public prosecution service; Criminal prosecution; Assistant D.A.; Prosecutor's office; A. D. A.; Court prosecutor; Prosecutrix; Criminal prosecutor; Chief prosecutor; Prosecutorix; United States prosecutor; Prosecutor (United States); Procureur; County prosecutor; Prosecutions
·p.pr. & ·vb.n. of Prosecute.
prosecutor
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
Prosecution; Prosecute; Prosecution's; Prosecutors; Prosecuted; Public prosecutor; Public Prosecutor; Prosecuting attorney; Public prosecutors; Prosecuting; Prosecuting Attorney; Public prosecution service; Criminal prosecution; Assistant D.A.; Prosecutor's office; A. D. A.; Court prosecutor; Prosecutrix; Criminal prosecutor; Chief prosecutor; Prosecutorix; United States prosecutor; Prosecutor (United States); Procureur; County prosecutor; Prosecutions
n.
Plaintiff, accuser.
Wikipédia
Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor
Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, 1 W.L.R. 965 (1956), is a leading Privy Council case that defined the scope of the hearsay rule. It was a case heard on appeal from the Supreme Court of the Federation of Malaya.
